TAMAKONA & MILKONA
1. What is Tamakona and Milkona powder
These products can be used for three purposes:
- Oral food challenge at medical institutions
- Simple and easy daily intake at home for children with egg and/or milk allergies
- Baby food for introducing small amounts of egg and/or milk from 6 months of age
2. Oral food challenge (OFC)
Tamakona and Milkona were developed based on published evidences and the Japanese guidelines for food allergy to make OFC easier and more reliable. Tamakona and Milkona are particularly useful for stepwise OFC (Figure1)reducing the risk of allergic reactions. With a reaction rate of less than 20%, Tamakona and Milkona make OFC safer and less of a burden for children. By starting with small amounts, stepwise OFC also allows early exposure to small quantities, which can prevent the complete elimination of egg and/or milk for children with allergies to these foods.
Figure1. Stepwise oral food challenge

Figure 2. Our products and the Japanese guidelines for food allergy

3. The product information
Tamakona 25
Tamakona 25 contains 25mg of egg protein (Kjeldahl method).
It is equivalent to approximately 0.2g of whole egg boiled for at least 15 minutes which includes 0.13g of boiled egg white.
Tamakona 250
Tamakona 250 meets the “ low dose” of OFC according to the Japanese guideline for food allergy.
It contains 250 mg of egg protein (Kjeldahl method).
It is equivalent to approximately 2 g of whole egg boiled for at least 15 minutes which includes 1.3 g of boiled egg white. It is equal to 1/32-1/25 of a whole egg.
Tamakona 750
Tamakona 750 meets the “medium dose” of OFC according to the Japanese guideline for food allergy.
It contains 750 mg of egg protein (Kjeldahl method).
It is equivalent to approximately 6 g of whole egg boiled for at least 15 minutes which includes 4 g of boiled egg white.
It is equal to 1/8 of a whole egg.
Mirukona 100
Milkona 100 meets the “low dose” of OFC according to the Japanese guideline for food allergy.
It contains 100mg of milk protein (Kjeldahl method), which is equivalent to 3ml of milk.
Because it is made from skimmed milk powder, its antigenicity may be slightly lower than that of 3ml of raw cow’s milk.
Table. Product information

4. Evidences of Tamakona and Milkona powder
【Oral food challenge】
Egg
- Stepwise single-dose oral egg challenge: a multicenter prospective study. Yanagida et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2019; 7: 716-8.e6.
(Further information is provided below) - Timing of onset of allergic symptoms following low-dose milk and egg challenges. Yanagida et al. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2021; 32: 612-5
(Further information is provided below) - Threshold and safe ingestion dose among infants sensitized to hen’s egg. Mitomori et al. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2022; 33: e13830.
(Further information is provided below)
Milk
- Increasing specific immunoglobulin E levels correlate with the risk of anaphylaxis during an oral food challenge. Yanagida et al. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2018; 29: 417-24
- Relationship between serum allergen-specific immunoglobulin E and threshold dose in an oral food challenge. Yanagida et al. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2023; 34: e13926.
【Daily intake at home and oral immunotherapy】
Egg
- Safe egg yolk consumption after a negative result for low-dose egg oral food challenge. Yanagida et al. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2021; 32: 170-6
(refer to the information below for further details) - Long-term outcomes of oral immunotherapy for anaphylactic egg allergy in children. Sasamoto et al. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global 2022;1: 138-144.
Milk
- Safe consumption of processed foods after negative medium-dose cow’s milk oral food challenge. Vanlaya et al. Allergology Int 2023 (in press)
- A randomized trial of oral immunotherapy for pediatric cow’s milk-induced anaphylaxis: Heated vs unheated milk. Nagakura et al. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 2021; 32: 161-9
(Further information is provided below)
【Baby food and prevention】
Egg
- Two-step egg introduction for prevention of egg allergy in high-risk infants with eczema (PETIT): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Natsume et al. Lancet 2017; 389: 276-286
(Further information is provided below)
Evidence 1 : Stepwise single-dose oral egg challenge: a multicenter prospective study. Yanagida et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2019; 7: 716-8.e6
We conducted a food oral load test using the same powder as Tamakona 250 and Tamakona 750 at 4 hospitals and 3 clinics in Japan. The subjects were 252 patients with a history of egg allergy, median age 1.7 years (median, interquartile range 1.2-4.6 years), total IgE 172IU/mL (53-611), egg white specific IgE 14.3 kUA/L (4.3-33.8), obomucoid specific IgE 7.5 kUA/L (1.6-24.5). (24.5) .
Of the 252 patients, 200 (79.3%) had negative (asymptomatic) oral food challenge (OFC)food with Tamakona. Of the 52 positive subjects, 13 (25%) had mild severity as defined by anaphylaxis guidelines, 38 (73%) had moderate severity, and 1 (2%) had severe severity. Onset of symptoms ranged from 61 minutes (25 to 102), peak from 80 minutes (20 to 138), and resolution from 120 minutes (84 to 180). Oral antihistamines were administered in 34 patients (65%), oral steroids in 15 patients (29%), and inhaled beta2-stimulants in 5 patients (10%), with no severe cases requiring intramuscular adrenaline injection.
Of the 154 patients, 148 (96%) had negative (asymptomatic) food oral load tests with this powder. Of the 16 positive cases, 4 (25%) were mild in severity as defined by anaphylaxis guidelines, 12 (75%) were moderate, and 0 (0%) were severe. Onset of symptoms ranged from 48 minutes (28-90), peak from 65 minutes (49-100), and resolution from 133 minutes (86-153). Oral antihistamines were administered in 13 patients (81%), oral steroids in 6 patients (38%), beta2-stimulant inhalation in 4 patients (25%), and no severe cases required intramuscular adrenaline injection.
Evidence 2 : Timing of onset of allergic symptoms following low-dose milk and egg challenges. Yanagida et al. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2021; 32: 612-5
We conducted on children with a history of triggering symptoms or sensitization, resulted in 53 of 563 (9.4%) and 20 of 103 (19%) positives, respectively. Similar to the above study, the triggering symptoms started to appear about 60 minutes (median) after the chicken egg powder was loaded. On the other hand, the triggering symptoms of cow’s milk powder started to appear about 30 minutes (median) after loading. It was confirmed that the test can be safely administered to children with or suspected of having chicken egg or cow’s milk allergy.
Evidence 3 : Threshold and safe ingestion dose among infants sensitized to hen’s egg. Mitomori et al. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2022; 33: e13830
Results of a stepwise loading test in infants who had not eaten chicken eggs and who were sensitized to egg white-specific IgE were reported. Eighty-seven subjects included in the analysis were suspected of having eczema or other food allergies, so specific IgE antibody titers associated with chicken eggs were measured. The subjects were 9.9 months of age (median, same below), with a total IgE level of 101 IU/mL, egg white-specific IgE level of 18.0 kUA/L, and obomucoid-specific IgE level of 0.99 kUA/L. A small loading test with a powder equivalent to Tamakona 250 was performed, and 12 (14%) were positive and Adrenaline intramuscular injection was required for 1 patient (1.1%). A moderate-dose challenge test with a powder equivalent to Tamakona 750® was performed on 75 patients who tested negative, and 9 (12%) tested positive. A stepwise loading test on unfed and IgE-sensitized children was found to be relatively safe, with many children escaping complete elimination.
Evidence 4 : Safe egg yolk consumption after a negative result for low-dose egg oral food challenge. Yanagida et al. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2021; 32: 170-6
In a clinical study in which 276 subjects (median age 1.2 years, total IgE 104 IU/mL, egg white-specific IgE 14.7 kUA/L, obomucoid-specific IgE 5.3 kUA/L) were instructed to consume egg yolk splice at home with a negative tolerance test, 6 subjects (2.1%) ) only had minor triggering symptoms; 5 of the 6 patients were able to continue the egg yolk binder thereafter, and 1 patient had mild respiratory symptoms, resulting in complete elimination of the egg yolk binder. Based on the above, it is considered that egg yolk bridges can be safely consumed if the Tamakona 250® loading test is negative.
Evidence 5 : Two-step egg introduction for prevention of egg allergy in high-risk infants with eczema (PETIT): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Natsume et al. Lancet 2017; 389: 276-286
This study included infants who had itchy eczema or atopic dermatitis within a few months of birth. Their eczema was cured by appropriate skincare and use of topical steroids by the time they turned 6 months old. From 6 months of age, a very small amount of cooked whole egg powder, equivalent to Tamakona 25, was given once a day to the infants. At 9 months of age, the amount was increased to about 5 times, equivalent to half of Tamakona 250. The safety of the procedure was confirmed by OFC at the beginning of the study and when increasing the amount of food. An equal number of infants were also given the placebo powder which did not include hen’s eggs for comparison. When the infants were 1 year old, the number of children who showed allergic reactions to the equivalent of about half a cooked whole egg was compared between the two groups. The group that ate cooked whole egg powder had a lower prevalence of children who showed allergic reactions compared with the group that ate placebo powder.
This study was published in 2017, and in response, the Japanese Society of Pediatric Allergy issued a “Recommendation on the Prevention of the Development of Egg Allergy” and recommended that the consumption of eggs in weaning food should not be delayed in order to prevent the onset of egg allergy.
Modified from Natsume O, Kabashima S, et.al.Lancet. 2017 Jan 21;389(10066):276-286
5. Note
These products can be used in OFC as well as other egg- and milk-containing foods. Allergic symptoms may be induced if they are ingested by a person suffering from an allergy. OFC is a medical procedure conducted by physician experts at a medical institution under the clinical guidelines and should not be conducted by parents or guardians at home. If parents or guardians have any concerns about food allergies, please consult your home doctor or a specialist nearby.